SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1954 Supreme(Gau) 66

BRIJ NARAIN
PARAKINKAR CHAKMA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF TRIPURA – Respondent


JUDGEMENT

Brij Narain, C.J.

[1] Parakinkar Chakma appellant has been convicted by the learned Sessions Judge, Tripura Under Section 325 read with Section 149, IPC and Under Section 365, IPC and has been sentenced to a period of 2 years' R. I. under each count and both these sentences have been ordered to run concurrently. The appellant was further charged Under Section 395, IPC but he has been acquitted of the offence under that section 22 other accused had stood their trial along with appellant before the learned Sessions Judge in Sessions Trial No. 4 of 1954 but all of them were acquitted by the learned Sessions Judge on 26-7-1954. A number of other persons were also implicated in connection with the offences in question before the police but some of them were discharged by the police and as against other final report was ultimately submitted.

[2] The facts of the case as alleged by the prosecution are that Rajani Mohan Bidyaratna P.W. 1 came to India after partition in the first part of the 1948 and he migrated from Pakistan. He first came to Dharmanagar where he founded co-operative society named Swasti Samity, Rajani Mohan Bidyaratna worked as the chairman of the society which ha








































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top