T.N.R.TIRUMALPAD
Madanlal – Appellant
Versus
Babulal Agarwala – Respondent
2. The appeal was posted for hearing before the District Judge on 29-4-61. The appellant in the said appeal who is the respondent herein had engaged a lawyer from Calcutta to argue the appeal on his behalf. The petitioners had also engaged a lawyer from Karijnganj in Cachar District to appear for them. The petitioners lawyer from Karimganj sent a telegram on 21-4-61 to their local lawyer stating that the date, namely, 29-4-61 was unsuitable to him. This telegram was delivered only on 22-4-61 at 1-00 p.m. As 23-4-61 was a Sunday, an application was taken out on 24-4-61 by the petitioners for adjournment of the hearing of the appeal to the end of May, 1961 to enable their lawyer to come or for some other lawyer from Calcutta being engaged for them.
This p
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.