SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1967 Supreme(Gau) 20

C.JAGANNADHACHARYULU
Thokchom Ningol Polem Ongbi Pishak Devi – Appellant
Versus
R. K. Chandani – Respondent


Advocates:
T.N. Bhattacharjee, for Appellant; M. Charugopal Singh, for Respondent No. 1.

JUDGEMENT :

This is a second appeal filed in forma pauperis by the appellant in first Civil Appeal No. 33/62/19 of 1963 on the file of the Additional District Judge Manipur, against his Judgement and decree dated 7-1-1964 dismissing the appeal filed by her against the judgement and decree dated 13-3-1962 of the Munsiff of the valley at Imphal in Civil Suit No 64/1960 decreeing the suit against her.

2. The first respondent (R.K. Chandani Singh-plaintiff-P.W. 5) filed Civil Suit Case 64 of 1960 on 9-5-1960 for declaration of his title to and possession of the plaint schedule land, which is the southern 1/3 of an Ingkhol covered by Patta No. 90/144 I.W.T. (8-2/3 lessas in extent) and for mesne profits, alleging that the 2nd respondent (Polem Nandeswar Singh, second defendant in the suit) acquired it from his father late Polem Chaoba Singh, in or about 1950, that he was ever since in possession and enjoyment of it, that he sold it to the first respondent under Ext. A/1 (registered sale deed dated 27-5-1959), for Rs. 400, that the appellant (D.W. 3 the first defendant) was permitted to live in the house constructed by the 2nd respondent, that she refused to vacate the land and that, the



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top