BRIJ NARAIN
Soraisem Kamini Singh – Appellant
Versus
Chongtham Iboyaima Singh – Respondent
2. The important facts of the case are uncontroverted and it has not been challenged that Chongthara Iboyaima Singh of Khwai Wahengbam Leikai, defendant borrowed Rs. 4000/- from Soraisem Kamini Singh of Segalambi, Takhellambam Leikai, plaintiff on 28-1-1949 at 3 per cent. per mensem, vide Ex. P/A and a double-storied (shop) building situated in No. 145/36 Imphal Town Fund, was mortgaged in this deed. The plaintiff alleged that nothing had been paid towards the principal or interest and so the suit which has given rise to this appeal, was instituted on 25-1-1951 for recovery of Rs. 5678-as. 10-ps. 8 along with costs and pendente lite and future interest, etc.
3. The defence was that Rs. 2000/- had been paid within 5 months of the execution of the mortgage deed in question and Rs. 2120/-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.