SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1959 Supreme(Gau) 46

T.N.R.TIRUMALPAD
Anoubam Gourbapu Sarma – Appellant
Versus
Anoubam Radharomon Sarma – Respondent


Advocates:
T.N. Bhattacharjee, for Appellant; Y. Jyotindra Singh, for Respondent.

JUDGMENT

This is an appeal against the order of the First Subordinate Judge, Manipur allowing absolute discharge to the respondent-insolvent under Sec. 41(1) of the Provincial Insolvency Act.

2. Only two points were raised in appeal - one was that the learned Subordinate Judge had no jurisdiction to entertain and dispose of the application under the Provincial Insolvency Act in the absence of a Gazette Notification by the State Government investing him with power under Sec. 3 of the Provincial Insolvency Act. The second point raised was that the respondent acted in a mala fide manner in concealing a half share of the land under certain patta numbers which were obtained by him, as a result of the decision of the First Subordinate Judge in Title Suit No. 27 of 1954.

3. I shall take up the question of jurisdiction first. This insolvency case was originally filed as No. 5 of 1952 in the Court of the Judicial Commissioner as at that time the Judicial Commissioner alone had jurisdiction in the matter of insolvency. After the Provincial Insolvency Act was made applicable to Manipur on 1-1-1950, and the Manipur (Courts) Act, 1955 was also passed, insolvency cases stood transferred to the Cou







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top