T.N.R.TIRUMALPAD
Nameirakpam Pishak Singh – Appellant
Versus
Forest Officer, Manipur Forest, Department – Respondent
The petitioner applies for a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ against respondents 1 to 3.
2. On 16-1-1960, the Forest Officer of the Manipur Administration called for tenders from contractors, by his notice Annexure-I, for extraction and for supply of timber from Block MXVI of the Government forest to be submitted to the Chief Forest Officer on or before 23-1-1960. The selected contractor had to cut the trees marked by the Forest Department and then reduce them into round and square logs and to supply them to the Forest Department at certain fixed points between 9th and 19th milestones on the I.T. Road. The tenderers had to mention in the tender the number of buffaloes they had in their possession, their working experience, financial background etc. Clause 5 of the notice stated that the Administration reserved the right to accept any tender without assigning any reasons therefor. Clause 11 provided that the Administration may make insertion of fresh clauses in the tender notice from time to time which may not however be to the disadvantage to the contractor. We are not concerned with the other clauses in the notice. On 22-1-1960 an amendment was made to the notice me
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.