SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1961 Supreme(Gau) 23

T.N.R.TIRUMALPAD
Wangkheimayum Kulabidhu Singh – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Th. Munindra Kumar Singh, Asst. Govt. Advocate, for Respondent.

ORDER :-

This reference has to be accepted.

2. one Ningthoujam Magha Singh filed a petition before the S.D.M., I.E and Th. on 5-5-1962, stating that he has been in possession of 3 sangams and one loushel of land covered by patta No. 129/234-Kh. Pana, Thoubal Tahsil for about 26 years, that the petitioners herein, who are father and sons forcibly entered the land on 12-6-1962 with their cattle and over-ploughed the land and that this dispute was likely to cause a breach, of the peace. He therefore prayed for action under Section 145, Cri. P.C. This complaint was sent for report to the Police by the Magistrate. The Police reported to the Magistrate on 12-6-1962, saying that that the petitioners were found to have entered the land forcibly on 1-5-1962 and cultivated the same, that they continued in possession until then and further that when the complainant asked them not to enter the land, the petitioners threatened him toy holding dangerous weapons and that if the complainant's party came face to face with the petitioners' party, there was likelihood of breach of the peace. The report further said that the Police Officer arrested the petitioners under Section 151, Cri. P.C. to preven












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top