T.NANDAKUMAR SINGH
H. Khamba (Constable) – Appellant
Versus
State of Manipur – Respondent
T. Nandakumar Singh, J.
1. None appears for the petitioner. Heard Ms. Sundari, learned GA appearing for the respondents. By this writ petition, the petitioner is assailing (1) the order of the Superintendent of Police, Bishnupur, (Mr. P. Doungel) i.e., respondent No. 4, dated 31-10-1994 for dismissing the petitioner only on the charge that the petitioner had unauthorizedly absented for 36 days i.e. for the absence w.e.f. 9-3-1994 to 5-4-1994 and 14 4-1994 to 21-4-1994 and (ii) order dated 2-3-2005 for dismissing the appeal against the dismissal order dated 31-10-1994 passed by the same person, i.e. Mr. P. Doungel, IPS, in the capacity of appellate authority, i.e., Dy. I.G. of Police (Range-III).
2. It is clear from the records that the appellate authority who passed the order dated 2.3.2005 is the same person who passed the dismissal order dated 31.10.1994. It is stated in the writ petition that the petitioner was initially placed under suspension for the unauthorized one day's absence; subsequently departmental enquiry had been initiated for the unauthorized absence of (1) 9.3.1994 to 5.4.1994 and (2) 14.4.1994 to 21.4.1994. Pursuant to the said departmental enquiry, Mr. P. Dou
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.