SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Gau) 97

T.NANDAKUMAR SINGH
H. Khamba (Constable) – Appellant
Versus
State of Manipur – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For Respondents/Defendant: Ms. Sundari, G.A.

ORDER

T. Nandakumar Singh, J.

1. None appears for the petitioner. Heard Ms. Sundari, learned GA appearing for the respondents. By this writ petition, the petitioner is assailing (1) the order of the Superintendent of Police, Bishnupur, (Mr. P. Doungel) i.e., respondent No. 4, dated 31-10-1994 for dismissing the petitioner only on the charge that the petitioner had unauthorizedly absented for 36 days i.e. for the absence w.e.f. 9-3-1994 to 5-4-1994 and 14 4-1994 to 21-4-1994 and (ii) order dated 2-3-2005 for dismissing the appeal against the dismissal order dated 31-10-1994 passed by the same person, i.e. Mr. P. Doungel, IPS, in the capacity of appellate authority, i.e., Dy. I.G. of Police (Range-III).

2. It is clear from the records that the appellate authority who passed the order dated 2.3.2005 is the same person who passed the dismissal order dated 31.10.1994. It is stated in the writ petition that the petitioner was initially placed under suspension for the unauthorized one day's absence; subsequently departmental enquiry had been initiated for the unauthorized absence of (1) 9.3.1994 to 5.4.1994 and (2) 14.4.1994 to 21.4.1994. Pursuant to the said departmental enquiry, Mr. P. Dou






































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top