UTPALENDU BIKAS SAHA
Madhu Sarma – Appellant
Versus
Ajit Sarma – Respondent
U.B. Saha, J.
1. The instant revision petition is filed by the petitioners, four in numbers, namely, Sri Madhu Sarma, Sri Nirmal Sarma, Sri Ranjit Sarma and Sri Pankaj Sarma, challenging the judgment and order, dated, 18.11.2003 passed by the learned Ad-hoc Addl. Sessions Judge in Criminal Revision No. 74 of 1998 whereby and whereunder the learned Ad-hoc Addl. Sessions Judge set aside the order dated 19.08.1998 passed by the learned Executive Magistrate, Guwahati (hereinafter referred to as "Magistrate") in Case No. 52m of 1991 under sections 145 /146 of the Criminal Procedure Code (for short, "Cr.P.C.") declaring the possession regarding the disputed land in favour of the petitioners who were 2nd party in the proceeding before the Magistrate. Heard Mr. K. Agarwal, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners (hereinafter referred to as "2nd party-petitioners") as well as Mr. B.K. Sarma, learned counsel appearing for the OP (hereinafter referred to as "1st party-OP").
2. Brief facts needed to be discussed are as follows:-
The 1st party-OP filed an application on 08.02.1991 under Section 145 of Cr.P.C. before the learned Magistrate, being No. 52m of 1991 alleging that his fath
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.