2012 Supreme(Gau) 1088
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI
Anima Hazarika, J.
Miss Rajashree Khound D/o Shri Ronjut Khound
Vs.
The State of Assam
WP (C) No. 3739/2012
Decided On: 13.09.2012
For Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff:Mr. B.D. Das, Senior Advocate, Mr. H.K. Sarma, Mr. N. Goswami and Mr. D. Nath
For Respondents/Defendant:Mr. D. Saikia, Standing Counsel, Health Department, Mr. B. Gogoi, for Respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3 and Mr. M.R. Pathak Standing Counsel, Education Department for Respondent Nos. 4 & 5
Headnote:
Admission Rules (Regulation for Admission of Undergraduate Students) Rules 2007 - Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and full Participation) Act, 1995 - Section 39 - Physical disabilities - Rejection of admission - Petitioner has demonstrated academic excellence by way of securing 89.3% marks in HSLC Examination followed by 86.6% marks in Higher Secondary (Science) - Thereafter she contested for admission to MBBS/BDS courses in Medical Colleges of Assam and Regional Dental College at for session through the Combined Entrance Examination - Petitioner secured 186 marks and her rank in the Entrance Examination is claimed to be - In Educational Notice published showing names of candidates who appeared for counseling and selected by a Selection Board thereby allowed for provisional admission into First Year MBBS/BDS courses in Medical Colleges of Assam and Regional Dental College at for session name of the petitioner bearing finds place against Serial in list of Un-reserved candidates for Medical College - Held, Intention of authorities to subject her to further medical tests so as to judge her ability to undergo Medical Courses is wholly impermissible in law being grossly volatile of mandates of Act - In backdrop of a scenario when a student is unable to compete with the general candidates has been given right of reservation under Act in addition to a mandate on State to restructure curriculum of studies for the benefit of students with disabilities including hearing impairment a permission tos respondents to subject writ petitioner who is a person suffering from disability but has competed as a general candidate securing a position amongst general candidates to undergo further physical tests to conform to standard of curriculum and educational system framed by respondents largely keeping in view the general candidates without special needs will amount to negation of mandates - Petition allowed
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anima Hazarika
1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner Miss Rajashree Khound seeking an order from this Court directing the Respondents to allow her to take admission in MBBS course for the session 2012 on the basis of her selection in the Combined Entrance Examination as per the result published on 24.07.2012. The petitioner has demonstrated academic excellence by way of securing 89.3% marks in HSLC Examination followed by 86.6% marks in Higher Secondary (Science). Thereafter she contested for admission to MBBS/BDS courses in the Medical Colleges of Assam and Regional Dental College at Guwahati for the session 2012 through the Combined Entrance Examination. The petitioner secured 186 marks and her rank in the Entrance Examination is claimed to be 199. In the Educational Notice published showing the names of candidates who appeared for counseling and selected by a Selection Board thereby allowed for provisional admission into the First Year MBBS/BDS courses in the Medical Colleges of Assam and Regional Dental College at Guwahati for the session 2012, the name of the petitioner bearing Roll No. 381071 finds place against Serial No. 6 in the list of "Un-reserved (General Merit)" candidates for Jorhat Medical College, Jorhat. However, when the petitioner appeared before the respondent No. 3, the Principal, Jorhat Medical College, Jorhat for admission in terms of her selection, she was verbally informed that as she was found suffering from Hearing Impairment of approximately 69% in the left and 71% in the right ear, she was not eligible for admission in the Medical College. This was followed by an application dated 29.07.2012 filed by the petitioner asking the Principal to put in record the reasons for rejection of admission followed by a representation filed by her on 30.07.2012 to the Director of Medical Education, Assam stating that due to her hearing problem she was wearing hearing aid and that she is quite a normal girl having no physical disabilities but she is being denied admission inspite of her selection without giving any lawful reason. The petitioner further stated that her hearing impairment is of no hindrance for pursuing studies in MBBS course with the aid of modern sophisticated appliances. Per contra, the respondent No. 2, the Director of Medical Education, Assam has filed an affidavit-in-opposition, inter alia, disclosing that during the admission process of the writ petitioner consequent to her selection in the Combined Entrance Examination, the Principal, Jorhat Medical College constituted a Medical Board which examined the candidates for their medical fitness and the said Medical Board found the writ petitioner unfit for admission into MBBS Course due to her bilateral sensory neuronal deafness (Right ear 60%, Left ear 77%). It is the stand of the respondents that in terms of the Admission Rules (Regulation for Admission of Undergraduate Students) Rules 2007 (amended upto 2012), and the Medical Council of India guidelines, a candidate must be found physically fit by the Medical Examination Board at the time of admission. The respondents have also relied upon a Medical Council of India's circular dated 14.07.2000 containing the guidelines of the said Council for filling up of reserved seats for persons having locomotor disabilities in Medicine Courses. Quoting a case decided by the Hon'ble Delhi High Court (Rekha Tyagi -Vs- Vice Chancellor, University of Delhi and others) wherein it was held that section 39 of the Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and full Participation) Act, 1995 (for short, the Act 1995) has no application for reservation of seats in educational institutions as the said section falls under the Chapter "Employment". The Medical Council of India further noted that the said judgment was reversed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India mandating reservation of seats in favour of persons suffering from physical disabilities