I.A.ANSARI
Azmal Hussain – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent
I.A. Ansari, J.
1. This revision is directed against the judgment and order, dated 31.08.2004, passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Cachar, Silchar, in Crl. Appeal No. 13(1)/2004, upholding the conviction of the accused-petitioner, under Sections 457 and 324 of the IPC, passed, under the judgment and order, dated 19.02.2004, of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Cachar, Silchar, in G.R. Case No. 1549/1999. However, the learned Appellate Court modified the sentence passed against the accused-petitioner, for his conviction under Section 457 IPC, by directing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 6 months and pay fine of Rs.5,000/- and, in default, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 15 days; whereas, the learned trial Court had sentenced the accused-petitioner, for his conviction under Section 457 IPC, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 2 years and to pay fine of Rs.1,000/- and, in default, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 3 months. Similarly, the learned Appellate Court reduced the sentence passed by the learned trial Court, against the accused-appellant, for his conviction under Section 324 IPC, inasmuch as the learned Appellate Court sentenced the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.