ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, SUBHASIS TALAPATRA
State of Tripura – Appellant
Versus
Sulekha Sarkar – Respondent
Subhasis Talapatra, J.
1. For filing the writ appeal against the judgment & order, dated 06.06.2012, as passed in WP (C) 296 of 2011, the delay of 146 (one hundred and forty six) days has occurred and for condoning such delay this miscellaneous application, under Chapter VA of the Gauhati High Court Rules, has been filed by the State-appellants. Heard Mr. J Majumder, learned counsel, appearing for the State-appellants and Mr. S Deb, learned senior counsel, assisted by Mr. S.B. Debnath, learned counsel, appearing for the respondent No.1.
2. In response to the notice, as issued by the order dated 25.01.2012, the respondents appeared and filed objection to the prayer for condonation of delay.
Causes as assigned in this application for explaining the delay can be encapsulated as follows:-
(a) The copy of the impugned judgment & order, dated 06.06.2011, was received on 09.06.2011. Thereafter, the Government Advocate sent his file to the office of the Director General of Police along with the note dated 13.06.2011. As per the Memorandum No.F.29(9)-FIN(G)/2004, dated 18.04.2011, before taking any legal action the opinion of the Law Department and the Finance Department is required to
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.