I.A. Ansari, J.

1. This revision has put to challenge the order, dated 01.02.2007, passed by the learned Civil Judge, Lakhimpur, in Misc. Case No. 19/2006 (arisen out of Title Execution Case No. 9/2004), whereby the objection, raised by the judgment-debtors, alleging that the delivery of possession of land has been given, in excess of the decretal land, to the decree-holders, has been dismissed. Before coming to the merit of this revision, I set out hereinbelow, in brief, the material facts, which have led to this revision.

(i) The decree holders-opposite party instituted Title Suit No. 12/2001 seeking, inter alia, declaration of their rights, title and interest over the suit land, as described in Schedule' A' to the plaint, as well as recovery of khas possession of land in Schedule 'B', the land, described in Schedule 'B', being a part of the land of Schedule 'A', by evicting the defendants therefrom.

(ii) By judgment and order, dated 16.02.2004, the learned Civil Judge (Sr. Division), Lakhimpur, decreed the suit by describing the decree as a preliminary decree, whereby plaintiffs' rights, title and interest over the land in Schedule' A', inter alia, was declared and the khas