Amitava Roy, J.

1. Abstruse issues of constitutional overtones in the singular perspective of the Sixth Schedule confront this Court in this adjudicative venture. In assailment in the present appeal is the judgment and order dated 16.11.2010 rendered by a learned Single Bench of this Court in WP(C) 330 (SH)/2010. Not only thereby the notification No. DCA.18/2004/Pt./141 dated 17.9.2010 in the name of the Governor of Meghalaya under Paragraph 16(2) of the Sixth Schedule to the Constitution of India extending the term of administration of Garo Hills Autonomous District and conduct of the functions and powers vested in or exercisable by the Garo Hills Autonomous District Council (for short hereafter referred to as the Council) has been annulled, operative directions have been issued as well inter alia to convene a Special Session of the Council by the State Respondents on 25.11.2010 at 10A.M. for holding a floor test to ascertain if the Nationalist Congress Party (for short hereafter referred to as the NCP) led alliance command the majority in the House and to submit compliance report to this Court on or before 28.11.2010.

2. We have heard Mr. N. Dutta, Sr. Advocate assisted by