A.C.UPADHYAY
Md. Rahamat Ali – Appellant
Versus
Jairunnessa – Respondent
A.C. Upadhyay, J.
1. Heard Mr. S. Deb, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. S. Chaudhuri, learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner and Ms. N. Guha, learned Counsel representing the Respondent.
2. The interesting question to be decided in this revision petition is whether the dismissal of a petition filed under 2 Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short 'Cr.P.C.') debars the wife, from claiming maintenance allowance from the husband by filing a second application under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
3. The facts, necessary for disposal of this revision petition, may be stated, in brief, as follows:
The Respondent-wife filed an application under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the learned Judge, Family Court, Kailashahar, North Tripura, claiming maintenance from her husband, the Petitioner herein. The petition so filed by the Respondent was registered as Criminal Misc. Case No. 91/2008.In the said petition, the Respondent stated that the marriage between the parties took place about 22 years back, but because of torture upon her and being instigated by another wife of the husband-Petitioner, she was compelled to desert th
Bhagat Ram v. State of Rajasthan (1972) 2 SCC 466
State of Rajasthan v. Tarachand Jain (1974) 3 SCC 72
M. Nagabhushana v. State of Karnataka and Ors. (2011) 3 SCC 408
Chaturbhuj v. Sita Bai (2008) 2 SCC 316
Ramesh Chander Kaushal v. Mrs. Veena Kaushal and Ors. AIR 1978 SC 1807
Savitaben Somabhai Bhatiya v. State of Gujarat and Ors. 2005 (2) Supreme 503
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.