SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Gau) 707

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI (AGARTALA BENCH)
P.K. Musahary, J.
Sri Mintu Muhuri S/o. Sri Ajit Muhuri and Smt. Lila Talukdar W/o. Sri Pranab Talukdar - Appellants
Vs.
The State of Tripura - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 16 of 2003
Decided On: 25.08.2011

Advocates Appeared:
For Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff: B. Deb, Adv.
For Respondents/Defendant: P. Bhattacharjee, Addl. P.P.

Headnote:

Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 109, 354, 306, 376 - Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Sections 313 and 161 – Appeal against convicted - Victim girl was forcibly dragged – Examination of accused - Brief is that and her younger brother residents Police Station, were returning home from residence of their Roy and crossing the house were obstructed by i.e. the convict Appellant No. 1 and convict Appellant No. 2 respectively. gagged and dragged towards the back side of the dwelling hut detained Rajesh threatening him not to disclose the fact to anybody else - After about half an hour was released - Then she came back to her brother and they together returned home - Out of shame and fear they could not disclose the fact to anybody instantly - On being enquired Rajesh disclosed to her mother the incident of sexual assault also disclosed the fact to her mother - In following morning i.e. in the morning visited the house – Held, Evidence as narrated above speaks volumes about abetment of the Appellants in committing suicide by victim girl. Under Section 107 Indian Penal Code, 1860, a person is said to abet commission of suicide when a person instigates any person to do that thing as stated in clauses First or secondly or thirdly - Clause First of Section 107 Indian Penal Code, 1860 speaks about instigating a person to do a thing. Instigate, in simple dictionary meaning, means to make start or happen - Abet means to help or encourage to do wrong - Victim girl was instigated to take the extreme action to end her life - She would not have taken recourse to commit suicide if she was not denied justice and got insulted by the accused Appellants. It was the Appellants who encouraged victim to do the wrong act of committing suicide - Appellants are abettors of wrong act. There was No. earthly reason for a normal young lady like victim girl to do the wrong act like commission of suicide but for instigation or encouragement to do so by the convict Appellants. The instigation/encouragement to commit suicide is apparent - Appeal dismissed

JUDGMENT

P.K. Musahary, J.

1. Heard Mr. B. Deb, learned Counsel appearing for the Appellants. Heard also Mr. P. Bhattacharjee, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Tripura.

2. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 5.3.03 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, South Tripura, Udaipur in Case No. S.T.85(ST)/U) of 2000 convicting and sentencing the convict Appellant No. 1 to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 2 years and to pay a fine of Rs. 2,000/- and in default of payment of fine to suffer further imprisonment for 3 months, and also for convicting and sentencing the convict Appellant No. 2 to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 2 years and to pay a fine of Rs. 2000/- and in default of payment of fine to suffer further imprisonment for 3 months for committing offence under Section 354 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 read with Section 109 of Indian Penal Code, 1860.

3. The prosecution story in brief is that on 13.1.1998 at about 7.30 p.m. while Reshmi Debbarma and her younger brother Rajesh Debbarma, residents of Dhwajanagar under R.K. Pur Police Station, were returning home from the residence of their aunt Sonali Singha Roy and crossing the house of Smti. Lila Talukdar were obstructed by Mintu Muhuri and Lila Talukdar i.e. the convict Appellant No. 1 and convict Appellant No. 2 respectively. Mintu gagged and dragged Reshmi towards the back side of the dwelling hut of Lila Talukdar. Lila Talukdar detained Rajesh threatening him not to disclose the fact to anybody else. After about half an hour Resmi was released by Mintu. Then she came back to her brother and they together returned home. Out of shame and fear they could not disclose the fact to anybody instantly. In the following evening Reshmi was noticed by her mother weeping on her study table. On being enquired Rajesh disclosed to her mother the incident of sexual assault on Reshmi. Reshmi also disclosed the fact to her mother. In the following morning i.e. in the morning of 15.1.98 at about 7.30 A.M. Rekha Debbarma, mother of Reshmi accompanied by Reshmi herself, Rajesh, Sonali Singha Roy and Rakhi Debbarma visited the house of their neighbour Kanu Ghosh seeking advice and redressal. At that time Kanan Ghosh, W/o Kanu Ghosh, Mintu and Lila Talukdar were also present there. In course of discussion all the neighbours blamed the victim girl and her family members since they belong to Scheduled Tribe community and all the neighbours belong to Bengali community. Reshmi charged Mintu for assaulting her sexually and remarked that if she had to die, she would die with Mintu Muhuri. With this remarks she ran away towards her residence. After a few minutes there was alarm saying fire-fire. Rekha Debbarma, Rajesh Debbarma and other relatives rushed to their residence and found smoke in their dwelling hut with doors bolted from inside. They opened the door and found Reshmi burning. Reshmi was wrapped by a quilt and the fire got extinguished. The entire body of Reshmi was found to have been burnt. She was immediately brought to Tripura Sundari District Hospital, Udaipur wherefrom she was shifted to G.B. Hospital, Agartala. She died on 17.1.1998 due to 100% burn injury. A suicidal note written by Reshmi in Bengali was found by Rajesh Debbarma. It contains the fact that as Mintu S/o. Ajit Muhuri committed physical torture on her and for this reason she was ending her life urging suitable punishment for Mintu.

4. A written FIR was lodged on 16.1.98 by Rajdhan Debbarma, PW 4, father of the victim, who was serving in the police department as Head Constable at Manughat P.S. on the basis of which R.K. Pur P.S. Case No. 9/1998 was registered under Section 376 Indian Penal Code, 1860. During investigation, the first investigating officer, Smti. Ila Deb, PW 14, seized a suicide note written in Bengali and answer script written by the deceased during her School examination from Udaipur Girls' Higher Secondary School. The charge sheet was filed by the third investigating officer S






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top