C.R. Sarma, J.

1. The above mentioned seven appeals, involve similar question of law and facts and the parties are represented by the same set of Advocates. The suits, which have given rise to these appeals, have been filed by the same power of attorney holder on behalf of the Plaintiffs. Therefore, for the sake of convenience and as agreed to by the learned Counsel, appearing for both the parties, we prefer to dispose of these appeals by this common judgment and order.

2. The respective Respondents, who instituted the Money Suit Nos. 2 of 2008, 3 of 208, 4 of 2008, 5 of 2008, 6 of 2008, 7 of 2008 and 8 of 2008 for recovery of money from the Appellants, are the sole proprietorial firms, represented by their Proprietors, as indicated below:

(i) M/s T.C. Syndicate, represented by its sole proprietor, namely, Sri Tapio Charu, which is the Respondent in RFA No. 07 of 2009, instituted the Money Suit No. 02 of 2008 in the Court of the learned Deputy Commissioner cum District Judge, Khonsa, Tirap, Arunachal Pradesh, against the Appellants, seeking realization of Rs.16,59,736/- being the principal amount and interest thereon, towards supply of electrical goods to the Appellant No. 4 o