BIPLAB KUMAR SHARMA
Raj Khatun – Appellant
Versus
States of Tripura – Respondent
B.K. Sharma, J.
1. The only grievance raised in this writ petition is non-registration of a police case pursuant to FIR lodged with the Officer-in-charge, Jatrapur Police Station on 27.1.2010. When no case was registered, the Petitioners furnished information to the Superintendent of Police, West District, Agartala vide Annexure-B to the writ petition, dated 29.1.2010. Thereafter also, no action having been taken to register a police case, the Petitioners have filed the instant writ petition.
2. In the counter-affidavit, filed by the Respondent, the allegations made by the Petitioner have been denied. According to the Respondents, it is the Petitioners who were aggressive against the official Respondents. Consequently, a Police case being Jatrapur P.S. Case No. 3 of 2010 has been registered under Sections 148/149/353/332, IPC and at present, the investigation is on.
3. Mr. K. Roy, learned Counsel for the Petitioners relying on a decision of the Apex Court in Lallan Chaudhary and Ors., v. State of Bihar and Anr., AIR 2006 SCW 5172 submits that the police officer is duty bound to register a case on receiving the information of cognizable offence and the reliability of the inform
Lallan Chaudhary and Ors. v. State of Bihar and Anr. AIR 2006 SCW 5172
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.