SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Gau) 83

AMITAVA ROY, C.R.SARMA
Birendra Gour – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff: A.K. Phukan, Adv.
For Respondents/Defendant: D. Das, Adv.

JUDGMENT

Amitava Roy, J.

1. The conviction and sentence recorded by the Judgment and Order dated 30.04.2004 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Cachar, Silchar in Sessions Case No. 19/2003, whereby the accused-Appellant has been found guilty of an offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and awarded sentence of rigorous imprisonment for life, as well as of fine of Rs. 5000/-. in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment to further 3 (Three) months is under challenge in the instant appeal from the Jail.

We have heard Mr. A.K. Phukan, learned Amicus Curiae for the accused-Appellant and Mr. D. Das, learned Public Prosecutor, Assam for the State.

2. The run up of facts to the instant appeal, in short, is necessary. Lakhipur P.S. Case No. 170/2000 under Sections 302/34 IPC was registered on an FIR dated 26.06.2000 lodged by one Bangshilal Urang with the Incharge, Joypur Police Outpost alleging that in the previous evening that is, 25.06.2000 his brother Kalababu Urang while returning from Ainachara Market had been attacked by some miscreants with Dao and that he had succumbed to the injuries sustained. The FIR disclosed that the informant had been apprised of the incident by his























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top