IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI (KOHIMA BENCH)
MAIBAM B.K. SINGH, J.
Imlitemjen Tsudir and Ors. – Appellant
Vs.
State of Nagaland and Ors. – Respondent
Writ Petition (C) No. 97(K) of 2008
Decided On: 15.07.2009
Certiorari - Recruitment Method - Nagaland Civil Secretariat - Notification No. SAB-5/68/05 - Summary of Acts and Sections: The court discussed the conditions and recruitment method provided in para 2 (b) of the Government's Notification bearing No. SAB-5/68/05, dated 14.12.07, and the promotion order of the Respondent Nos. 10 to 37 dated 2.6.08. The court examined the eligibility criteria and method of recruitment provided in para 2 (b) of the Notification dated 14.12.07 and found no unreasonableness or irrationality in it. The court also highlighted the Special Selection Committee's recommendation for filling up 50% of the A-Scale posts on merit-cum-seniority basis, contrary to the Notification, and quashed the appointment/promotion orders for Respondent Nos. 27 to 36. The court directed the State Respondents to fill up the said 50% of the upgraded A-Scale posts, strictly adhering to the guidelines given in para 2 Clause (a) of the Government Notification dated 14.12.07.
Fact of the Case:
The petition was filed for issuance of a writ of Certiorari to quash the conditions and recruitment method provided in a government's notification, recommendation of the Special Selection Committee, and the promotion order of the Respondent Nos. 10 to 37. The Petitioners, Grade-IV employees, were aggrieved by the conditions and the method of recruitment provided in the government's Notification dated 14.12.07.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the Special Selection Committee recommended filling up 50% of the A-Scale posts on merit-cum-seniority basis, contrary to the Notification, and quashed the appointment/promotion orders for Respondent Nos. 27 to 36. The court directed the State Respondents to fill up the said 50% of the upgraded A-Scale posts, strictly adhering to the guidelines given in the Notification dated 14.12.07.
Issues: The issues involved in the case included the validity of the conditions and recruitment method provided in the government's Notification dated 14.12.07, the Special Selection Committee's recommendation for filling up 50% of the A-Scale posts on merit-cum-seniority basis, and the subsequent appointment/promotion orders for Respondent Nos. 27 to 36.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the eligibility criteria and method of recruitment provided in the Notification dated 14.12.07 were reasonable and rational. However, the court quashed the appointment/promotion orders for Respondent Nos. 27 to 36 due to the Special Selection Committee's recommendation for filling up 50% of the A-Scale posts on merit-cum-seniority basis, contrary to the Notification.
Final Decision: The writ petition was partly allowed, and the court directed the State Respondents to fill up the said 50% of the upgraded A-Scale posts, strictly adhering to the guidelines given in the Notification dated 14.12.07.
Mutum B.K. Singh, J.
1. This petition has been filed for issuance of a writ of Certiorari for quashing the conditions and recruitment method provided in para 2 (b) of the Government's Notification bearing No. SAB-5/68/05, dated 14.12.07, recommendation of the Special Selection Committee and the promotion order of the Respondent Nos. 10 to 37 dated 2.6.08, coupled with a prayer for giving a direction to fill up all 27 upgraded posts on seniority-cum-merit basis without conducting any examination.
2. Heard Ms. Z. Zhimomi, learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioners and also heard Mrs. Y. Longkumer, learned Government Advocate for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 9 and Mr. C. T. Jamir, learned Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 10 to 17, 22, 27 to 36. None appears for the remaining Respondents.
3. Facts, avoiding unnecessary details, are that the Petitioners are Grade-IV employees and members of Nagaland Secretariat Grade-IV Employees Association. On persistent demand of the Association for providing promotional avenue to the higher grade, the Government of Nagaland upgraded 5% of the sanctioned strength of the Grade-IV posts i.e. 27 in numbers to the level of Grade-Ill post, prescribing 3 (three) different scales of pay (hereinafter referred to as Scale-A, B & C posts respectively), vide Notification bearing No. SAB-5/68/05 dated 14.12.07. As per the said Notification, Scale-A posts, 20 in numbers are to be filled up on the basis of seniority-cum-merit from amongst the Grade-IV employees. The remaining 7 (seven) posts under the Scale-B & C are to be filled up on the basis of merit-cum-seniority through a Special Selection Committee from amongst the Grade-IV employees who have put in minimum 10 years of regular service and possessed Class-VIII educational qualification. The Special Selection Committee conducted test, both written and interview on 12.3.08 without giving general notice to all the Grade-IV employees in Nagaland Civil Secretariat and recommended Respondent Nos. 10 to 36 for appointment on promotion against the upgraded posts on promotion solely on the basis of Confidential Memorandum dated 29.2.08, which was issued only to some office peons on pick and choose basis. The recommended candidates were subsequently appointed/promoted against the upgraded posts vide order dated 12.6.08 issued by the Government of Nagaland, Secretariat Administrative Branch-B. The Petitioners are aggrieved by the conditions and the method of recruitment provided in para 2 (b) of the Government Notification dated 14.12.07 stating that the said conditions are quite arbitrary and unreasonable. The Special Selection Committee recommended 50% of the A-Scale posts on merit-cum-seniority basis contrary to the Government Notification dated 14.12.07 and the recommendation list was also manipulated by overwriting. Hence, the entire election process and the impugned appointment/promotion order are liable to be quashed.
4. The State Respondents as well as the private Respondents contested the petitions by filing affidavit-in-opposition denying almost all the allegations made by the Petitioners. The State Respondents however, admitted in their affidavit-in-opposition that 50% of the A-Scale posts were recommended by the Special Selection Committee on merit-cum-seniority basis but stated that the said recommendation was made under extreme necessity due to the existence of an intermediary post in between Grade-IV and Grade-III posts. The Respondents stated that Petitioner Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 8 & 18 appeared in the interview but failed to qualify and as such they have no right to challenge the proceeding of the Special Selection Committee.
5. Having heard the submissions advanced by the rival parties and on perusal of the writ petition as well as affidavit-in-oppositions, the examination of the said Notification dated 14.12.07 has become necessary for determination of the disputes involved in this case. The said Notification runs as follows:
The Governor of Nagaland
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.