A.C.UPADHYAY
Subal Kumar Dey – Appellant
Versus
Public Prosecutor, West Tripura District – Respondent
A.C. Upadhyay, J.
1. Heard Mr. A.K. Bhowmik, learned senior Counsel assisted by Mr. S. Ghosh, learned Counsel, Mr. N. Adhikari, learned Advocate General, Tripura, Mr. S. Talapatra, learned senior Counsel assisted by Mr. S. Chakraborty, learned Addl. Government Advocate and Mr. P.K. Biswas, learned Counsel on behalf of the respective parties.
2. These criminal revision petitions, arising out of the same set of facts, which raise similar questions of law and facts, have been taken up together for disposal by this common judgment and order.
3. In Criminal Revision Petition No. 04 of 2010, the accused/Petitioner, Sri Subal Kr. Dey, prays for his acquittal from the charges under Section 500/501 IPC, by quashing the order dated 18.01.2010 passed by learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Court No. 2, West Tripura, in complaint case C.R. No. 03 of 2005, titled, 'Public Prosecutor v. Ratan Lai Nath and Subal Kumar Dey' (accused).
In Criminal Revision Petition No. 05 of 2010, the accused/Petitioners Smti. Paramita Livingstone and Sri Pradip Datta Bhowmik, seek quashing ofthe order dated 18.01.2010 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Court No. 2, Agartala, West Tripura, in complamt case C.R.
Ratilal Bhanji Mithan v. State of Maharashtra (1979) 2 SCC 179
Rameshchandra Nandlal Parikh v. State of Gujarat and Anr. AIR 2006 SC 915
Damodar S. Prabhu v. Sayed Babalal H. AIR 2010 SC 1907
Narinderjit Singh Sahni v. Union of India (2002) 2 SCC 210
State of A.P. v. Cheemalapati Ganeswara Rao AIR 1963 SC 1850:(1964) 3 SCR 297
Harjinder Singh v. State of Punjab (1985) 1 SCC 422:1985 SCC (Cri) 93
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.