SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Gau) 452

J.CHELAMESWAR, AMITAVA ROY, I.A.ANSARI
Forhana Begum Laskar – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Amitava Roy, J.

1. The subject matter of this appeal is the process relating to a meeting under the Assam Panchayat Act, 1994 (as amended) in which a no confidence motion against the appellant, the President of the Nitainagar Gaon Panchayat, District Hailakandi (hereafter referred to as the Gaon Panchayat/Panchayat) had been passed on 12.3.209. By the common judgment and order dated 30.3.2009 passed in WP(C) 1008/2009 and WP(C) 1086/2009 preferred by the writ appellant herein, the challenge to the legality and/or validity of the said exercise has been negated in essence on the ground that the alleged departures from the prescriptions of procedure laid down in Section 15of the Act which are essentially directory in nature do not per se vitiate the same.

2. At the admission of the appeal, a reference to the decision of a Division Bench of this Court rendered in Mumtaz Rana Laskar and Ors. v. State of Assam and Ors. 2006 (1) GLT 46, to this effect having been made, by the order dated 15.5.2009, this appeal has been placed before this Bench inter alia to consider the correctness of the view expressed therein.

3. We have heard Dr. B. Ahmed, Learned Counsel for the appellant, Ms. B.

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top