HRISHIKESH ROY
Anjali Medhi – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent
Hrishikesh Roy, J.
1. Heard Mr. N. Dutta, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. R.K. Bora, learned Government Advocate who appears for respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 10. Mr. P.J. Saikia, learned Advocate appears for the respondent Nos. 4, 5 and 6. The contesting respondent No. 7 is represented by Mr. M.K. Choudhury, learned senior counsel. Mr. P. Bayan, learned Advocate appears for respondent Nos. 8 and 9. Respondent No. 11 have intervened in the matter and filed counter-affidavit.
2. This matter pertains to selection for allotment of an LPG dealership to be commissioned at Chaygaon under the Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as BHPL) and only schedule tribe category persons were eligible to be considered for the said LPG Distributorship. The petitioner Anjali Medhi claiming herself to be a "Rabha", who are recognized as Scheduled Tribe (P) in the State, offered her candidature along with a certificate dated 11.11.1990 certifying her status.
There were other 21 applicants including respondent No. 7 and following the selection by the dealer selection board, the list of successful candidates were notified on 30.8.2001, where the p
Kumari Madhuri Patil v. Additional Commissioner, Tribal Development
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.