SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Gau) 43

I.A.ANSARI
Runu Devi – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent


JUDGMENT

I.A. Ansari, J.

1. By making this application, under Section 482, Cr.PC, the petitioner has put to challenge the sustainability of the First Information Report ('FIR'), which has led to registration of Jorhat Police Station Case No. 417/2008, under Sections 471/420 IPC, against the petitioner, as accused.

2. I have heard Mr. R.D. Lall, learned Counsel for the accused-petitioner, and Mr. K. Munir, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam.

3. The case, as made out against the accused-petitioner, in the FIR, is, in brief, thus: While GR Case No. 647/2007 was pending in the court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jorhat, a petition was allegedly filed, on 16.7.2008, by the present petitioner informing the court that the petitioner's son, Tridip Barkataky, who was an accused in the said case, had died. Along with her said petition, the petitioner is also alleged to have submitted a photostat of death certificate as regards the death of her said son, the certificate having been shown to have been issued by Gauhati Medical College Hospital. By making the said petition, the petitioner allegedly prayed for closing the said case against her son, accused Tridip Barkataky. The learned





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top