I.A.ANSARI
Runu Devi – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent
I.A. Ansari, J.
1. By making this application, under Section 482, Cr.PC, the petitioner has put to challenge the sustainability of the First Information Report ('FIR'), which has led to registration of Jorhat Police Station Case No. 417/2008, under Sections 471/420 IPC, against the petitioner, as accused.
2. I have heard Mr. R.D. Lall, learned Counsel for the accused-petitioner, and Mr. K. Munir, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam.
3. The case, as made out against the accused-petitioner, in the FIR, is, in brief, thus: While GR Case No. 647/2007 was pending in the court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jorhat, a petition was allegedly filed, on 16.7.2008, by the present petitioner informing the court that the petitioner's son, Tridip Barkataky, who was an accused in the said case, had died. Along with her said petition, the petitioner is also alleged to have submitted a photostat of death certificate as regards the death of her said son, the certificate having been shown to have been issued by Gauhati Medical College Hospital. By making the said petition, the petitioner allegedly prayed for closing the said case against her son, accused Tridip Barkataky. The learned
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.