SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Gau) 447

P.K.MUSAHARY
Arunachal Trade and Commercial Agency – Appellant
Versus
State of Arunachal Pradesh – Respondent


JUDGMENT

P.K. Musahary, J.

1. The facts leading to filing this writ petition are that the Executive Engineer, Rural Works Department, Laaying-Yangte (Sangram), published a notice inviting tender (NIT in short) on behalf of Governor of Arunachal Pradesh from eligible contractors, Joint Venture firms registered with CPWD/PWD/NBCC/NEEPCO/NHPC/BRO Agencies through Press Notice No. KK (RWD) PMGSY (PH-VII) NIT-01/2008-09 dated 28.11.2008 which was published/advertised in the local daily "Arunachal Times" dated 30.11.2008 followed by Corrigendum No. KK(RWD)/PMGSY(PH-VII)NlT-01/08-09dated9.12.2008, in respect of estimated cost of Construction and Maintenance and Earnest Money. Pursuant to aforesaid NIT and corrigendum, the petitioner along with other firms purchased necessary Bid Document in respect of Package No. 2 (BRTF Kuru Bridge pt. to Pari Village-stage-I) AR/14/03/026, estimated cost of Construction and Maintenance Rs. 1458.83 lakh by paying the required fee of Rs. 15,000/- and having filled the necessary requirements in the documents submitted Tender form/Bids for the packages aforesaid by depositing the earnest money of Rs. 29.17 lakh. The Technical Bid was opened on 18.12.2008 as p












































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top