BIPLAB KUMAR SHARMA
Md. Khorshed Ali – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent
B.K. Sharma, J.
1. The petitioner an advocate, who admittedly was in occupation of Government land, is aggrieved by his eviction from the land and demolition of his property therein.
2. As per the averments made in the writ petition, the petitioner had purchased the possessory right of the land measuring 1 katha and 10 lechas under Dag No. 359 situated at Village Khanapara, Mauza Beltola, Sub- Registry Guwahati in the district of Kamrup. Such purchase was in the year 1976 (18.6.1976). According to the petitioner he developed the land by plantation, etc., and also paid the land revenue from 1979-1991 when the Government stopped receiving such revenue (Touzibahi).
3. The wife of the petitioner who is a Government employee, availed official Government quarter in the year 1990 and the family of the petitioner started living there. The house which was constructed by the petitioner on the Government land was rented out and it remained under rent till 1997. The petitioner also paid municipal tax to the Guwahati Municipality Corporation ('GMC') from January 1997 to March 2005.
4. In April 2000 the petitioner made an application to the Deputy Commissioner, Kamrup for settlement of the s
U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad and Anr. v. Friends Co-op. Housing Society Ltd. AIR 1996 SC 114
Ahmedabad Municipality Corporation v. Nawab Khan Gulabkhan and Ors. AIR 1997 SC 152
Government of A.P. v. Thummala Krishna Rao and Anr. AIR 1982 SC 1081
Wire-netting Stores v. Delhi Development Authority (1969) 3 SCC 415
Olga Tellis and Ors. v. Bombay Municipality Corporation and Ors. AIR 1986 SC 180
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.