SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Gau) 729

H.N.SARMA
State of Assam – Appellant
Versus
Md. Azad Ali – Respondent


JUDGMENT

H.N. Sarma, J.

1. Being unable to accept the verdict of acquittal passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Morigaon acquitting the accused/respondents from the charges under Sections 147/447/448/323/325/436, IPC in Sessions case No. 16 of 2000 vide judgment and order dated 31-8-2001, the State of Assam preferred this appeal.

2. Heard Mr. K. Munir, learned Addl. PP, Assam for the State of Assam and Mr. HRA Choudhury, learned Sr. counsel assisted by Mr. I. Uddin, learned advocate for the accused/respondents.

3. The prosecution case was initiated on the basis of an FIR dated 21-2-1996 lodged by one Must. Pariban Nessa with the O/C, Morigaon Police Station who was examined in the case as P.W. 1 alleging inter alia that on 20-2-1996 at about 8.00 p.m. while her son Md. Mazibur Rahman was returning home an altercation took place with the accused persons who were engaged in erecting a gate for the Idd festival and after his returning home the accused persons namely Azad Ali, Tazimuddin Suleman Ali, Firoz Ali, Irfan Ali, Nurul Haque, Md. Pipili, Abu Hussain Babuli, Dilwar Hussain and Danti armed with dao, lathi etc. trespassed into their compound and assaulted her husband Md. Habibur Rah



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top