SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Gau) 480

TINLIANTHANG VAIPHEI
Thomas Nongtdu – Appellant
Versus
State of Meghalaya – Respondent


ORDER

T. Vaiphei, J.

1. The short but interesting question which falls for consideration in this criminal petition presented under Section 482, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr. P.C.) is whether the petitioner, who has been discharged by Magistrate on the report purportedly filed by the police under Section 169, Cr. P.C. can be subjected to further investigation by the police. The petitioner, who is implicated in connection with Shillong Sadar P.S. Case No. 86(5)09 Under Section 120-B/224/333, IPC, was discharged by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Shillong in her order dated 5-6-2009, which is as follows:

Date 5-6-2009.

C.R. put up today. Seen and perused discharged report from liabilities of the instant case against accused person, Shri Thomas Nongtdu from S.I. K.R. Marak, I.O. of the case dated 5-6-2009.

S. I. Marak, vide report above, submits that the accused named above, who was arrested and forwarded before this Court on 4-6-2009 was thoroughly interrogated and during interrogation it transpires that:

1. The accused is having good background and is presently holding the post as MDC of JHADC.

2. That the accused is in the habit of helping people who came to him for donation





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top