IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI (AIZAWL BENCH)
P.K. Musahary, J.
Chanam Ranjit Meitei - Appellants
Vs.
Union of India (UOI) - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 11 of 2008
Decided On : 05.05.2009
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – Sections 40 , 211/212/213/228/281, 279 , 281(4) , 313 , 360 , 52A(2) , 235(2) , 535 and 537 - Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Section 20(b)(ii)(C) 53 , 55, 56 and 57 - Carrying Ganja in said jeep - Recovered 92 packets of ganja - Charge sheet - Appellant was taken to place where blue colour Mahindra Marshal Jeep was standing and while he was asked in presence of other persons he replied that he was driver of said vehicle and he was carrying Ganja in said jeep - Custom party failed to apprehend other person and he remained absconder - Vehicle was brought to the customs office where custom party opened secret cavities of the jeep in presence of accused appellant, civilian witnesses and superintendent of custom and recovered 92 packets of ganja in compressed form, different sizes properly wrapped with paper and polythene - Recovered materials were seized - Representative sample in small quantity from every packet were drawn and mixed together, 50 grams each in three packets which were duly sealed with signature of accused-appellant and witness including gazetted officers of custom department - One sample of seized Ganja was sent to F.S.L - Appellant was arrested - Inspector G.K. Mang took statements of civilian witnesses - Held, Learned Counsel for appellant that failure or omission of prosecution in exhibiting/proving signatures of accused on certain documents relied upon by prosecution - prosecution also failed to prove that seized Ganja was placed by Investigating Officer after being seized in custody of Officer-in-Charge of concerned police station samples were drawn and packets sealed in presence of Officer-in-Charge concerned and there was no chance of tampering or manoeuvring before sending sample packets to F.S.L - A reasonable doubt has arisen on tampering of sample packets in view of fact that Chemical Examiner received dried leaves with seeds which are not Ganja within definition whereas Chemical Examiner as per his report - Aforesaid doubt, having not been removed conviction as recorded by learned trial court against accused appellant cannot be upheld and accused should be given benefit of doubt and he should be acquitted on benefit of doubt - Court give said benefit of doubt interfere with conviction and sentence handed down on accused appellant and set aside impugned Judgment dated recording conviction and sentence by learned Judge, Special Court (ND & PS Act) - Court hereby direct acquittal and setting accused appellant at liberty forthwith unless his further detention is required in connection with any other case - Appeal accordingly stands allowed.
P.K. Musahary, J.
1. The appellant was convicted under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (ND & PS, Act in short) and sentenced to undergo 10(ten) years rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 1,00,000, in default to suffer another two years imprisonment by judgment and order dated 23.7.2008 passed in Criminal Trial (Customs) No. 1/2006 by the learned Judge, Special Court, ND & PS Act, Mizoram, Aizawl. This appeal has been preferred against the said judgment and order for setting aside the conviction and sentence aforesaid.
2. The prosecution story has been narrated as follows:
Shri G.K. Mang, Inspector (A/S Unit) Customs Division, Aizawl received information on 25.5.2006 that one Mahindra Marshal Jeep in blue, colour with Ganja in secret cavities was proceeding towards Aizawl. He took down the information and forwarded the same to the Superintendent of Custom, Aizawl Division, who endorsed the case to the said Inspector G.K. Mang for taking further necessary action. On 26.5.2006, the Inspector G.K. Mang with his party accompanied by two civilian witnesses proceeded to and intercepted the vehicle at Nuthlawikawi. Two persons jumped out from the said vehicle and ran into the jungle. The VDP and Young Mizo Association (YMA) Seling Branch were requested over phone to come immediately for assistance in search of two persons who fled away from the said vehicle and ran into the jungle. Around 30(thirty) persons from the aforesaid organizations came and assisted the custom party in the search operation. The appellant was apprehended at around 1:30 to 2:00 P.M. on 26.5.2006. The appellant was taken to the place where the blue colour Mahindra Marshal Jeep was standing and while he was asked in presence of other persons, he replied that he was the driver of the said vehicle and he was carrying Ganja in the said jeep. The custom party failed to apprehend the other person and he remained absconder. The vehicle was brought to the custom's office at Aizawl where the custom party opened the secret cavities of the jeep in presence of the accused appellant, civilian witnesses and the superintendent of custom and recovered 92 packets of ganja in compressed form, different sizes properly wrapped with paper and polythene. The weighment of the Ganja recovered was taken which weighted net 310.246 kgs. On further checking of the said jeep, 03 pairs of number plates bearing No. MN-05A-1175, AS-OIT-7882 and W.B. 74D-2357 along with supporting registration certificates, having same chassis number and engine number, were also recovered. The recovered materials were seized. Representative sample in small quantity from every packet were drawn and mixed together, 50 grams each in three packets which were duly sealed with signature of accused-appellant and witness including gazetted officers of custom department. One sample of the seized Ganja was sent to F.S.L, Mualpui. The appellant was arrested. Inspector G.K. Mang took the statements of civilian witnesses on 29.5.2006. He also took the statements of civilian witnesses on 29.5.2006. The F.S.L report was received. The same was found to be ganja. The appellant was produced before the court of Magistrate, First Class, Aizawl on 27.5.2006 and was remanded to judicial custody on 29.5.2006, After completion of investigation, the Inspector, Shri. G.K. Mang submitted the charge sheet on 5.10.2006 under Section 20(b)(ii)(c) of the ND & PS Act against the accused-appellant and 4 other accused persons who are still absconding. The appellant pleaded not guilty and stood the trial. The prosecution produced and examined 4 witnesses while the appellant produced no witness in his defence.
3. I have heard Mr. S. Satyendra Singh, Learned Counsel for the appellant and Mr. Zothankhuma, learned Special Public prosecutor, appearing on behalf of the respondent.
4. Mr. Singh, Learned Counsel for the appellant assails the impugned judgment and order mainly on the grounds:
(i) Non-
Avtar Singh and Ors. v. State of Punjab:AIR 2002 SC 3343
Matloob v. State (Delhi Administration) (1997) 3 Crimes 98
Phool Kumar v. Delhi Administration AIR 1975 SC 905
Jai Kumar v. State of M.R. (1999) 5 SCC 1
Habeeb Mohammad v. State of Hyderabad AIR 1954 SC 51
Khatri Hemraj Amulakh v. State of Gujarat AIR 1972 SC 922
Sivaji Sahab Rao Bobade v. State of Maharashtra (1973) 2 SCC 793
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.