SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Gau) 394

UTPALENDU BIKAS SAHA
Pranab Dhar – Appellant
Versus
Rajesh Deb – Respondent


ORDER

U.B. Saha, J.

1. The instant writ petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, for quashing the order dated 8-10-2007 passed by the learned Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, (for short 'Claims Tribunal'), Court No. 2, West Tripura, Agartala in Case No. Civil Misc. 269 of 2006 whereby and whereunder the Claims Tribunal disallowed the prayer of the petitioner herein for review of the judgment and award dated 22-11-2006 passed in T.S. (MAC) No. 277/04 on the ground that the amendment of the judgment is not authorised under law.

2. Heard Mr. P. Chakraborty, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. D.R. Chowdhury, learned Counsel for the respondent No. 1 as well as Mr. P. Gautam, learned Counsel for the respondent No. 2, Divisional Manager, Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd.

3. In T. S. (MAC) No. 277 of 2004, the Claims Tribunal awarded compensation of Rs. 11,20,780/- in favour of the claimant-respondent No. 1 with interest @ 6% on and from the date of filing of the claim petition, i.e. 29-4-2004 as he sustained injuries on his person due to a vehicular accident, happened on 20-7-2003. The Claims Tribunal in its judgment and award held that the petitioner being t




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top