SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Gau) 181

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI
Jasti Chelameswar, Iqbal Ahmed Ansari and Arun Chandra Upadhyay, JJ.
Harez Ali and Anr. etc.
Vs.
State of Assam and Ors. etc.
Decided On : 16.03.2009

The main legal principle established in the judgment is that the 'yearly sale value' in Section 109(6) of the Assam Panchayat Act refers to the highest bid value offered by the eligible bidder, empowering the Zilla Parishad to invite tenders and settle properties with a yearly sale value exceeding one lakh.

Headnote:

Construction and Interpretation - Assam Panchayat Act - Section 109(6) - 105, 106, 109 - The judgment resolved the controversy on the interpretation of 'yearly sale value' in Section 109(6) of the Assam Panchayat Act, 1994. The court discussed conflicting views on whether the yearly sale value meant the minimum value fixed by the Panchayat or the highest value offered by the prospective settlee. The judgment analyzed the provisions of Sections 105, 106, and 109 and their application to the settlement of Hats, Ferries, and Fisheries, providing a detailed interpretation of the Act's provisions and their implications on the settlement process.

Fact of the Case:

The controversy arose from the cancellation of tenders for settlement of Ghats by the Anchalik Panchayat, leading to a dispute over the jurisdiction of the Zilla Parishad. The Zilla Parishad eventually allowed the highest bidders to run the Ghats, which was challenged in court. The single Judge set aside the settlement order, citing the yearly sale value as the determining factor for jurisdiction.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the yearly sale value, as per Section 109(6) of the Act, referred to the highest bid value offered by the eligible bidder, and not the minimum value fixed by the Panchayat. It held that the Zilla Parishad had the authority to invite tenders and settle properties with a yearly sale value exceeding one lakh, contrary to the previous interpretations.

Issues: The issues revolved around the interpretation of 'yearly sale value' in Section 109(6) of the Assam Panchayat Act, the jurisdiction of the Anchalik Panchayat and Zilla Parishad in settling properties, and the authority to invite tenders for settlement.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on a literal interpretation of the Act's provisions, emphasizing that the yearly sale value referred to the highest bid value offered by the eligible bidder. It clarified the roles of the Anchalik Panchayat and Zilla Parishad in inviting tenders and settling properties, providing a definitive interpretation of the law.

Final Decision: The judgment resolved the controversy by affirming the Zilla Parishad's authority to invite tenders and settle properties with a yearly sale value exceeding one lakh, and clarified the jurisdiction and roles of the Panchayats in the settlement process.

JUDGMENT

A.C. Upadhyay, J.

1. This Full Bench has been constituted to resolve the controversy arising from divergent views expressed by this High Court on construction and interpretation of Sub-section (6) of Section 109 of the Assam Panchayat Act, 1994 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). Though the controversy falls within a very narrow compass of interpretation of expression 'yearly sale value', in 'the Act', nonetheless, it entails a question of public importance in view of the confusion produced by conflicting observations of different Benches of this High Court. The expression, 'yearly sale value' is not defined expression in 'the Act', however, Sub-section (6) of Section 109 of the Act provides that if the 'yearly sale value' of the Hats, Ferries and Fisheries, falling under any Anchalik Panchayat, within the jurisdiction of Zilla Parishad exceeds Rs. 1 lakh, it shall be settled by the Zilla Parishad. The moot question which arises for consideration of this Court in this reference are as follows (i) whether yearly sale value would mean the minimum value fixed by the Panchayat while offering the property for settlement by tender or it is the highest value offered by the prospective settlee i.e. eligible highest bidder and (ii) Whether Zilla Parishad is empowered to invite tenders in respect of Hats, Ferries and Fisheries having yearly sale value of rupees more than a lakh.

2. While hearing WA No. 314 of 2008 (Harej Ali and Anr. v. State of Assam and Ors. a Division Bench of this Court presided over by the Chief Justice, being confronted with conflicting views of a Division Bench of this Court in Nagaon Zilla Parishad v. Rezia Begum and Ors. 2006 (Supp) 1 GLT 585, disagreed with the views on the construction of Section 109 of 'the Act', so expressed by the Division Bench and therefore, with utmost respect to the members of the Division Bench, decided to refer the matter to a Bench of appropriate strength in order to resolve the controversy in question once for all. The order of the Division Bench referring the matter to a larger Bench of appropriate strength, reads as follows:

19-11-08. The issue in the appeal is regarding the construction of Section109 Subsection (6) of the Assam Panchayat Act, 1994.

Chapter VII of the said enactment deals with the settlement of Hats, Ghats, Ferries etc. and distribution of proceeds and maintenance and regulation thereof. Section 105 deals with the settlement of Hats. Section 106 deals with the settlement of public Ferries other than Government Ferries. Section107 deals with the settlement of private Hats, Ghats and fisheries. While Sections105 and 106 deal with Hats and public Ferries respectively within the territorial jurisdiction of the Anchalik Panchayat Section 107 deals with Private Hats, Ghats and Fisheries within the jurisdiction of the Gaon Panchayat.

Section 109 deals with settlement of Fisheries of the Anchalik Panchayat. Sections 105, 106 and 109 respectively provide for the process by which the settlements contemplated under each one of those provisions are to be made. Those provisions also deal with the manner in which the proceeds are to be appropriated.

However, Sub-section (6) of Section 109 makes a special provision which reads as follows:

109(6). The Hats, Ferries and fisheries falling under any Anchalik Panchayat within the jurisdiction of Zilla Parishad, the yearly sale value of which is more than rupees one lakh shall be settled by the Zilla Parishad concerned for a period coinciding with and not exceeding one Panchayat Financial year as under Sections105, 106 and 109 in the manner prescribed. The powers of examination and final acceptance of such tenders shall be vested in the Standing Committee as under Section 81(1)(a). The distribution of sale proceeds shall be in the manner as prescribed in the foregoing sections.

Though the above mentioned Sub-section (6) occurs in Section 109 which essentially deals with the settlement of Fisheries of an Anchalik Parishad, Sub-sec




























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top