RANJAN GOGOI, BROJENDRA PRASAD KATAKEY
Pepsico India Holdings Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent
Ranjan Gogoi, J.
1. The core issue arising in this revision petition filed by the petitioner-company is whether "potato chips" manufactured and sold by the petitioner-company under the brand name "Lays" and "Uncle Chips" would be covered by entry 80 of Part A of the Second Schedule to the Assam Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as, "the Act") or the said product would fall under the residuary entry covered by the Fifth Schedule to the Act. The aforesaid question arises out of an order dated September 10, 2007 passed by the Commissioner of Taxes, Assam on an application filed by the petitioner-company under Section 105 of the Act.
2. The Assam Value Added Tax Act, 2003, has been brought into effect from May 1, 2005. The Act contains five Schedules. The First Schedule enumerates goods that are exempted from payment of tax. The Second Schedule consists of three parts—Part A, Part B and Part C which deal with different items chargeable to tax at the rate of four per cent. The Third and the Fourth Schedule which would not be relevant for the present adjudication deal with gold, silver, ornaments, jewellery, etc. etc., which are chargeable to tax at the first point
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.