SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Gau) 269

RANJAN GOGOI, BROJENDRA PRASAD KATAKEY
Pepsico India Holdings Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Ranjan Gogoi, J.

1. The core issue arising in this revision petition filed by the petitioner-company is whether "potato chips" manufactured and sold by the petitioner-company under the brand name "Lays" and "Uncle Chips" would be covered by entry 80 of Part A of the Second Schedule to the Assam Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as, "the Act") or the said product would fall under the residuary entry covered by the Fifth Schedule to the Act. The aforesaid question arises out of an order dated September 10, 2007 passed by the Commissioner of Taxes, Assam on an application filed by the petitioner-company under Section 105 of the Act.

2. The Assam Value Added Tax Act, 2003, has been brought into effect from May 1, 2005. The Act contains five Schedules. The First Schedule enumerates goods that are exempted from payment of tax. The Second Schedule consists of three parts—Part A, Part B and Part C which deal with different items chargeable to tax at the rate of four per cent. The Third and the Fourth Schedule which would not be relevant for the present adjudication deal with gold, silver, ornaments, jewellery, etc. etc., which are chargeable to tax at the first point




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top