SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Gau) 298

P.K.MUSAHARY
Damayanti Goswami – Appellant
Versus
Karuna Das – Respondent


ORDER

P.K. Musahary, J.

1. Heard Mr. Rajeswar Sarma, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners. None appears for the respondents without any steps in spite of notice being served on them.

2. This revision petition is directed against the order dated 5-6-2008 passed by the learned Munsiff No. 3. Kamrup, Guwahati in Title Suit No. 427/2007. The petitioners have been impleaded as defendants in the aforesaid Title Suit. Summons were issued on them from the Court on 6-8-2007, which were received for them by the wife of defendant No. 2. As the petitioners are businessmen, they have to move out side Guwahati frequently and on having come to know about the summons, they appeared in the Court on 24-8-2007 and filed an application praying for extension of time for filing of the written statement and the Court granted the time till 12-9-2007. The petitioners made another application on 12-9-2007 praying for extension of time for filing of the written statement and the same was allowed till 11-10-2007. Again the petitioners as defendants had to file an application on 11-10-2007 for the same purpose. The learned Munsiff allowed the application and fixed 20-11-2007 for filing the written statem












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top