SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Gau) 238

T.NANDAKUMAR SINGH, UTPALENDU BIKAS SAHA
Nabakumar Banik – Appellant
Versus
Amita Datta – Respondent


JUDGMENT

T. Nandakumar Singh, J.

1. Heard Mr. S. Talapatra, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. D. Bhattacharjee; learned Counsel appearing for the appellant as well as Mr. P. Roy Barman, learned Counsel for the respondent.

2. This appeal under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 is directed against the judgment and order dated 25-2-2005 passed by the learned Judge, Family Court, Agartala, West Tripura in Title Suit (Divorce) No. 22 of 2001 dismissing the said Title Suit for dissolution of marriage.

3. The factual panorama, in brief, of the appellant/husband in title Suit (Divorce) No. 22 of 2001 is recapitulated hereunder:

The appellant/husband filed an application under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short 'Act') for dissolution of marriage between the appellant/husband and the respondent/wife by a decree of divorce on the, inter alia, grounds as laid down in Section 13(1)(ia) and (ib) of the Act in the Court of the learned District Judge, West Tripura, Agartala. The appellant/husband pleaded in the application for a decree of divorce that the appellant/husband and the respondent/wife are the Hindu by religion and marriage between them took place on 10-11-19
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top