SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Gau) 131

T.NANDAKUMAR SINGH
Kailash Chandra Sarma – Appellant
Versus
Biraj Krishna Das – Respondent


ORDER

T. Nandakumar Singh, J.

1. Heard Mr. R. Sarma, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as Mr. S. Sarma, learned Counsel for the respondents.

2. By this revision petition, the petitioner/plaintiff is assailing the order dated 8-5-2008 passed by the learned Munsiff No. 3, Kamrup, Guwahati in Title Suit No. 167 of 2006 debarring the petitioner/plaintiff from cross-examination of the D.W. No. 2, Sri Diju Kalita and D.W. No. 4, Sri Robin Goswami.

3. On hearing the submission of the learned Counsel appearing for the parties, it appears that D.W. No. 3 was partly cross-examined on 28-3-2008 and further examination of the D.Ws. was fixed on 8-5-2008. On 8-5-2008, D.W. No. 3 did not appear before the Court for further cross-examination. On that day a petition No. 940 of 2008 was filed by the respondents/defendants which was supported by a medical certificate that the D.W. No. 3 could not appear before the Court for further cross-examination due to illness. On that day, i.e. on 8-5-2008, the D.W. No. 2, Sri Diju Kalita and, D.W. No. 4. Sri Robin Goswami appeared before the Court. The petitioner/plaintiff instead of cross-examining the D.W. Nos. 2 and 4, who were present before






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top