SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Gau) 235

UJJAL BHUYAN
JAMILA KHATUN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ASSAM – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. A. Mannaf.
Mr. U. K. Goswami, SC, Education Department, Mr. D. A. Kaiyum, Mr. A. Shariff.

JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL)

This case was heard on 06.03.2014 and today is fixed for delivery of order.

2. By way of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner seeks quashing of order dated 30.10.2012 issued by the Director of Elementary Education, Assam whereby appointment of the petitioner was found to be de hors the laid down procedure and direction was issued to the school authorities of Pub-Tumukabori M. E. Madrassa to allow the respondent No. 7 to continue as Hindi teacher of the said school.

3. Case of the petitioner is that Pub-Tumukabori M. E. Madrassa (School) was established in the year 1997 in the district of Morigaon. Respondent No. 7 was appointed as Hindi teacher of the school by the School Managing Committee in the year 2002. According to the petitioner, respondent No. 7 resigned from her service voluntarily w.e.f. 03.01.2003. Thereafter, petitioner was appointed by the School Managing Committee vide resolution dated 15.01.2003.

4. The school was recognized by the Government in the year 2005. Government of Assam framed guidelines to provide financial assistance to non-Government educational institutions within the State which were establish























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top