SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Gau) 30

A.M.SAPRE
NITYANANDA DUTTA – Appellant
Versus
DIMBESWAR PEGU – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. Heard Mr. G. N. Sahewalla, learned Senior Counsel, assisted by Ms. B. Sarma, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Mr. B. K. Bhatacharjee, learned counsel for the respondents.

2. This is a civil revision filed by the defendant under Section 115 of Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree dated 3.1.2007 passed by Munsiff No.1, Dhemaji in Title Suit No.4 of 2005.

3. By impugned judgment /decree, the trial court decreed the suit filed by the plaintiff under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act against the defendant and passed the decree for possession of the suit land.

4. So the short question, which arises for consideration in this revision petition is, whether trial court was justified in decreeing plaintiff’s suit for possession against the defendant in relation to the suit land?

5. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and on perusal of the record of the case, I am inclined to allow the revision and while setting aside of the impugned judgment/decree remand the case to the trial court for deciding the suit afresh on merits.

6. Since I have formed an opinion to remand the case to the trial court for its fresh decision, and hence, it i


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top