SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Gau) 23

BROJENDRA PRASAD KATAKEY
Samsul Haque Borbhuiya (D) by LRs. – Appellant
Versus
Md. Ibrahim Ali Borbhuiya – Respondent


ORDER

B.P. Katakey, J.

1. The legal heirs of defendant No. 1 and the defendant Nos. 2, 5, 6, 8, 10, 11, 13 to 18, 21 to 34, 34(a), 34(g), 35 to 38. and 19 other proforma defendants in Title Suit No. 13/1997 have preferred the present appeal challenging the judgment and preliminary decree both dated 7-4-2003 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Sr. Division), Hailakandi in the aforementioned suit de- daring the joint title of the plaintiffs (the original respondent Nos. 1 to 6 in the appeal) over the land measuring 32 Bigha 7 Katha 14 Chatak 9 Gonda 12 Kora 1 Kranti, described in Schedule 1 by partition of the said land by maintaining possession of the plaintiffs over the land described in Schedules 2 to 5 and drawing a preliminary decree for allotment of a separate share of the said land without reference to the Revenue Department and, thereafter, for preparation of the separate share.

2. The present respondent Nos. 1 to 3, 5, 6 and Mustt. Rukia begum (whose name has been struck off from the list of respondents on the prayer of the appellants vide order dated 6-5-2005 as she died on 20-7-2003) instituted Title Suit No. 13/1997 against the predecessor in interest of the present appellant

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top