SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Gau) 162

BROJENDRA PRASAD KATAKEY
Nityananda Dutta – Appellant
Versus
Anisul Haque – Respondent


JUDGMENT

B.P. Katakey, J.

1. The defendant No. 2, Sri Nityananda Dutta, in Title Suit No. 13/2003 filed by Md. Anisul Haque, the opposite party/landlord, in the Court of the learned Civil Judge (Jr. Division) at Jorhat, (now Munsiff) praying for. his ejectment along with two other persons, namely Sri Rohini Dutta and Sri Ramen Dutta, from the suit house on the ground of default in payment of the monthly rent and also for the violation of the terms and conditions of the tenancy, has challenged the judgment and decree dated 02.07.2005 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Sr. Division), Jorhat (now Civil Judge) in Title Appeal No. 4/2005, whereby and whereunder the suit of the plaintiff/opposite party No. 1 herein, was decreed by setting aside the judgment and decree dated 18.10.2004 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Jr. Division), No. 1, Jorhat (now Munsiff) in the said suit.

2. The opposite party No. 1 herein as plaintiff, instituted Title Suit No. 13/2003 under the provisions of the Assam Urban Areas Rent Control Act, 1972 (in short, "The Act") in the Court of the learned Civil Judge (Jr. Division), No. 1 at Jorhat praying for eviction of Sri Rohini Dutta (proforma opposite party No. 2
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top