SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Gau) 42

I.A.ANSARI
Rajeev Chakraborty – Appellant
Versus
Golaghat Truck Owners Association – Respondent


ORDER

I.A. Ansari, J.

1. The prime question, which this criminal revision has raised, is this: whether the date of drawing of a cheque or the period of validity of a cheque shall, for the purpose of computing the period of limitation of six months, as prescribed by Clause (a) of the proviso to Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (in short, 'the NI Act'), include the date on which the cheque is drawn by the drawer. Yet another equally important question, raised in this criminal revision, is: whether the period of limitation shall, as prescribed by Clause (a) of the proviso to Section 138 of the NI Act be computed from the date of presentation of the cheque to the payee's bank or from the date of presentation of the cheque to the drawee bank?

2. The opposite party herein has lodged, as complainant, a complaint, on 13.04.2005, in the Court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Golaghat, and this complaint has given rise to CR Case No. 463/2005, the complaint's case being, in brief, thus: The complainant is the President of Golaghat Truck Owners Association, which is an association of carrying and handling contractors of the Food Corporation of India. The accused has been hiri






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top