SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Gau) 422

AFTAB H.SAIKIA, P.K.MUSAHARY
Suben Maradi – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent


JUDGMENT

P.K. Musahary, J.

1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 10.6.2003 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Morigaon in Sessions Case No. 11/2001 convicting the accused-appellants under Section 302/201, IPC and sentencing them to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life with a fine of Rs.1,000/- each, in default to undergo R.I. for another one month.

2. The prosecution case arose out of an FIR lodged by Amulya Deka, PW 5 on 30.7.1997 with reference to GD. entry No. 659 dated 29.7.1997 alleging that after due enquiry, he came to know that in the month of March, on certain Monday, by night, the appellants alongwith other accused persons killed one Rajen Baraik arid burried his dead body within the house compound of accused Chandro Pator. During investigation, the accused persons unearthed the dead body in presence of police and some local people. One Raju Baraik, the elder brother of the deceased tried to conceal the whole occurrence taking Rs.3,600/- from the accused persons. One Fekal Paharia, PW-1, was the eye-witness to the occurrence.

3. After completion of investigation, the police submitted charge-sheet against the appellants and 3 (three) others for o


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top