SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Gau) 108

ANIMA HAZARIKA
Diganta Mazumdar – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Anima Hazarika, J.

1. Heard Mr. N. Chakravorty, learned Counsel for the appellant. Also heard Mr. D. Das, Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam.

2. The accused appellant has questioned the legality and validity of the judgment and order dated 30-4-2002 passed under Section 366/376(1) IPC in sessions case No. 46(D-M) 1998 by the learned Sessions Judge, Darrang, Mangaldoi, convicting the accused appellant under Section 366 IPC and sentencing him to suffer RI for 4 years and to pay a fine of Rs.1,00/-, in default, further RI for 2 months. The appellant was further convicted under Section 376(1) IPC and sentenced to suffer RI for 7 years and to pay a fine of Rs.3,000/- in default, further RI for 2 months.

3. The prosecution case In brief is that an FIR dated 5-1-98 has been lodged by one Smti Narmada Bhuyan, mother of the victim girl alleging that in the afternoon of 2-1-98 the victim girl was on the road at Tangla Town where she was intercepted by the accused. The accused appellant took her in his bicycle to his house and kept her there for the night. It is further alleged that the accused committed rape upon her. The following morning the victim came home and reported the incident













































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top