SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Gau) 265

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI
Iqbal Ahmed Ansari, J.
Chanchala Paul - Appellants
Vs.
State of Assam and Ors. - Respondent
W.P. (C) Nos. 106, 1267, 1268 and 2405 of 2005 and 4026 of 2007
Decided on : 03.04.2008

Advocates appeared:
For Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff: N. Dhar, B.K. Sen and M. Rakshit, Advs.
For Respondents/Defendant: T. Islam and H.R.A. Choudhury, Advs.

The sustainability of a suspension order and its impact on the petitioner's eligibility to challenge the appointment/promotion of another individual.

Headnote:

Suspension - Disciplinary Proceeding - WP(C) Nos. 1267/05, 106/05, 2405/05, 4026/2007 - Rule 6(1) of Assam Disciplinary and Appeal Rules, 1964 - The court found that the suspension order of the petitioner was sustainable in law due to unauthorized absence and defiance of orders. The appointment/promotion of the Respondent No. 5 could not be challenged by the petitioner as long as the suspension order continued.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, an Assistant Teacher, was suspended pending disciplinary proceeding for unauthorized absence and defiance of orders. The court found that the suspension order was sustainable in law and dismissed the writ petitions. The disciplinary proceeding was pending for a long time, and the court directed the authorities to dispose of the matter expeditiously.

Finding of the Court:

The court found the suspension order of the petitioner to be sustainable in law and dismissed the writ petitions. The authorities were directed to dispose of the disciplinary proceeding expeditiously.

Issues: The main issue was the sustainability of the suspension order and the petitioner's eligibility to challenge the appointment/promotion of Respondent No. 5.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the suspension order of the petitioner was sustainable in law due to unauthorized absence and defiance of orders. As long as the suspension order continued, the petitioner could not challenge the appointment/promotion of Respondent No. 5.

Final Decision: The court dismissed the writ petitions and directed the authorities to dispose of the disciplinary proceeding expeditiously.

JUDGMENT

I.A. Ansari, J.

1. All these four writ petitions, namely, WP(C) Nos. 1267/05, 106/05, 2405/05 and 4026/2007, have been heard together for the purpose of final disposal and all these writ petitions are being disposed of by this common order inasmuch as all these writ petitions are closely inter-linked with each other and the disposal of any of these writ petitions would have a bearing on the ultimate decision in the remaining writ petitions.

2. In the present writ petitions, the Petitioner, Smt. Chanchala Paul, was appointed, on 18.2.1981, as an Assistant Teacher in Bhanga ME School, Karimganj, and, having been so appointed, she joined the post on 21.1.1981. As far as Respondent No. 5, namely, Rashid Ahmed, in WP(C) No. 4026/2007, is concerned, he joined the post of Hindi Teacher in Bhanga ME School, Karimganj, on 1.4.1985, on being transferred from another school. The Petitioner was allowed to hold the charge of the office of the Headmaster of Bhanga ME School, Karimganj, by virtue of an order, dated 3.1.2004, passed in this regard. This order, dated 3.1.2004, was put to challenge by Respondent No. 5, on 23.8.2004, by way of a writ application, which gave rise to WP(C) No. 6068/2004. While WP(C) No. 6068/2004 was pending for decision. District Elementary Officer, Karimganj, determined, on 27.9.2004, the claim of seniority and promotion of Respondent No. 5 and held to the effect that he was neither the senior most teacher in Bhanga ME School, Karimganj nor did he have requisite qualification for selection and promotion to the post of Headmaster of the said school. Shortly, thereafter, i.e., on 13.12.2004, Smt. Chanchala Paul and some others submitted a representation to their authority concerned seeking regularization of their services in the post of Headmaster. While this representation was pending, District Elementary Officer, Karimganj, passed an order, on 1.1.2005, appointing the Block Elementary Education Officer, Badorpur ('the BEEO'), to hold the charge of office of the Headmaster of Bhanga ME School, Karimganj. This order, dated 1.1.2005, was impugned by the present Petitioner Smt. Chanchala Paul, on 7.1.2005, by way of a writ petition, which gave rise to WP(C) No. 106/2005. While this writ petition was still pending for decision. District Elementary Education Officer, Karimganj ('the DEEO'), appointed, on 17.1.2005, Smti. Jharna Dey, an Assamese Language Teacher of Bhanga ME School, Karimganj, as the Headmaster-in-Charge of the said school, for the period of pendency of WP(C) No. 106/2005. Before, however, making the appointment of Smt. Jharna Dey as the Headmaster-in-Charge of the said school, the DEEO issued, on 11.1.2005, a notice to the present writ Petitioner directing her to show cause as to why disciplinary proceeding shall not be initiated against her on certain accusations made against her. The present Petitioner submitted a reply, on 22.1.2005, to the said notice of show cause. However, on 28.1.2005, the DEEO, passed an order placing the Petitioner under suspension pending drawing of the disciplinary proceeding. The Petitioner challenged the said order of suspension by filing a writ petition on 17.2.2005. This writ petition gave rise to WP(C) No. 1267/2005. As the suspension order has not been interfered with, so far, by any authority superior to the DEEO or by the court, the writ Petitioner has continued to remain under suspension. In the meanwhile, the disciplinary proceeding, drawn against the present Petitioner, progressed and, upon holding regular inquiry, an inquiry report has been submitted, but this inquiry report has not yet been acted upon by the Respondents-authorities concerned.

3. What may, however, be pointed out, at this stage, is that WP(C) No. 6068/2004, which the present Respondent No. 5 had filed claiming promotion to the post of Headmaster of Bhanga ME School, Karimganj, was, eventually, disposed of on being withdrawn. As far as the appointment of Smt. Jharna Dey to hold the post of H














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top