H.N. Sarma, J.

1. Legality and validity of the appellate judgment and order dated 25.4.07 passed in Case No. 2867c/2000; 2868c/2000 and 2869c/2000 thereby affirmed the conviction but modified the sentence imposed upon the petitioner by the learned trial court in case No. 17,18 and 19/2004 is the subject matter of challenge in this batch of revision petition. The impugned judgment having been passed analogously and the learned Counsel having been agreed for disposal by a common judgment, these revision petitions are heard analogously and disposed of by this common judgment.

2. I have heard Mr. GP Bhowmik, learned Counsel for the accused/petitioner and Mr. A. Bora, learned Counsel who enters appearance on behalf of the complainant/respondent.

3. The complainant/respondent is a proprietorial firm and authorized dealer of BPL, Telecom Ltd. Products for the North East Region. During the course of business transaction, the accused petitioner being liable to pay certain amount to the complainant, the petitioner issued three different cheques from his existing account of the State Bank of India, Nagaon Branch on different dates i.e., on 15.6.2000 for Rs. 15,000/-; 20.7.2000 for Rs. 15