T. Nandakumar Singh, J.

1. This revision petition is directed against the very cryptic order dated 12.6.2008 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Jr. Divn.), Imphal in Judl. Misc. Case No. 72-A of 2008 (Ref. Original Suit No. 34 of 2007) for allowing the Respondent/Defendant No. 1 Shri Konthoujam Babungou Singh to file the written statement subject to cost of Rs. 300/-. The impugned cryptic order dated 12.6.2008 is quoted hereunder:

THE ORDER PASSED ON 12.6.2008.

Heard both the learned Counsel. Perused the materials on record, also gone through, the provision of Order 8, Rule 1. The reasons given by the Plaintiff/Defendant is satisfactory.

Hence, leave granted to file written statement. However a cost of Rs. 300/- is to be paid.

Sd/-

(A. Noutuneshwari Devi)

Civil Judge (Junior Division), Imphal

2. Mr. O. Kiranjit, learned Counsel, appears for the Petitioners/Plaintiffs in Original Suit No. 34 of 2007. None appears for the Respondent/Defendant No. 2, Shri Thokchom Nilachandra Singh without showing any cause inspite proper service of notice of the Revision petition. Mr. Kh. Santa appears for the Respondent/Defendant No. 1, Mr. Konthoujam Babungou Singh.

3. The present Petitioners, as th