IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI
Jasti Chelameswar and H.N. Sarma, JJ.
Mariamma Sebastian - Appellants
Vs.
Union of India (UOI) and Ors. - Respondent
Decided On: 26.10.2008
Pay Scale - Trained Graduate Teacher - The petitioner, appointed as a Junior Teacher, claimed entitlement to the pay scale of a trained graduate teacher due to her qualifications. The court held that unless appointed to the related post of trained graduate teacher, the petitioner is not entitled to the higher pay scale prescribed for such a post. The court found that the petitioner's appointment and qualifications did not align with the requirements for the higher pay scale, leading to the dismissal of the petition.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, appointed as a Junior Teacher, claimed entitlement to a higher pay scale and teaching allowance based on her qualifications as a graduate with a B.Ed. degree. The Central Administrative Tribunal granted a revised pay scale but denied the claim for the pay scale of a trained graduate teacher and teaching allowance. The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking further scrutiny of her grievances.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner, despite her qualifications, was not appointed as a trained graduate teacher and therefore not entitled to the higher pay scale prescribed for such a position. The court dismissed the petition, stating that the petitioner's claim was misplaced.
Issues: The main issue was whether the petitioner, appointed as a Junior Teacher, was entitled to the pay scale of a trained graduate teacher based on her qualifications.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the petitioner's appointment as a Junior Teacher and the requirements for a trained graduate teacher did not align, leading to the conclusion that the petitioner was not entitled to the higher pay scale claimed.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the writ petition, finding no merit in the petitioner's claim for the pay scale of a trained graduate teacher.
H.N. Sarma, J.
1. The petitioner being unsuccessful in getting relief, as prayed for, in OA No. 250/2001 filed before the Central; Administrative Tribunal, Guwahati Bench, in terms of the order dated 30.1.2002, has yet made another attempt to salvage her grievance by filing this writ petition.
2. We have heard Dr. N.K. Singh, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. H. Rahman, learned CGSC.
3. The petitioner having been selected for appointment as Junior Teacher under the establishment of Assam Rifles, she joined in the post on 1.6.1987. The existing pay scale of the Junior Teacher, at the relevant time, was Rs. 9,50-1,500 per month plus other allowances as per rules. The petitioner raised grievances that she being graduated with B.Ed, she is entitled to get scale of pay of Rs. 1,400-2,600 per month from the date of her joining and with effect from 1.1.1996 her pay should have been fixed at Rs. 5,500-9,000 per month, that she is entitled to pay scale of Rs. 6,500-10,500 on completion of 12 years of service with effect from 1.6.1999 and she is also entitled to get teaching allowance @ Rs. 1,00 per month. When these grievances were not meted out by the department, she approached the Central Administrative Tribunal by filing OA No 250/2001 seeking necessary relief.
4. The claim of the petitioner was contested by the respondents by Vising written statement. The learned Tribunal after hearing the parties and considering the matter in its entirety, taking note of the relief that was granted to the petitioner by raising the pay scale of Junior Teacher to the range of Rs. 4,000-7,000 per month with effect from 1.1.1996 and the petitioner not being appointed as trained graduate teacher but as Junior Teacher, held, not be entitled to the pay scale of trained graduate teacher. It was further held that the petitioner is also not entitled to teaching allowance at the rate of Rs. 100 per month as the same not allowable to the teachers under the establishment of Assam Rifles.
5. Aggrieved by the said judgment and order of the learned Tribunal, the petitioner has approached this Court by filing this writ petition praying for further scrutiny of her grievances.
6. During the course of hearing Dr. Singh has submitted that as on date the petitioner has no grievance regarding her claims other than non-payment of scale of pay allowable to the trained graduate teacher, as the other grievances have been settled by the authority to the satisfaction of the petitioner. Dr. Singh submits that the petitioner-being a graduate with B.Ed. Degree is to be categorized as a trained graduate teacher and is entitled to get her salary prescribed for such class of teacher which is higher than the Junior Teacher and the authority has unreasonably denied the same to her.
Par contra, Mr. Rahman contends that the petitioner having specifically appointed in the cadre of Junior Teacher she is not entitled to be paid the pay scale of trained graduate teacher. Although the petitioner referred to the benefits given to the Hindi teachers in the establishment of Assam Rifles, the respondents contended that the terms and conditions of appointment of Junior Teacher and the Senior Teacher are different from the Hindi teacher. The appointment of Hindi teacher is made on a special drivers per the policy decision of the Government of India for wide publicity of Hindi language and both the categories can not be equated.
Learned Counsel contends that the petitioner has already been granted the revised scale of pay @ Rs. 4,500-7,000 per month with effect from 1.1.1996 as applicable to the Junior Teachers of the Assam Rifles and after completion of 12 years of service on 1.6.1999, the petitioner has been granted financial upgradation in the scale of pay of Rs. 5,500-9,000 per month under Assured Career Progression Scheme as available to the teacher of the Assam Rifles with effect from 8.9.1999 when the aforesaid scheme came into force.
7. Taking note of the submissions made by Dr. Si
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.