SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Gau) 539

J.CHELAMESWAR, ANIMA HAZARIKA
Bijoy Daimary – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Anima Hazarika, J.

1. Heard Ms. P. Bhattacharya, learned Counsel, appearing for the petitioners. Also heard Ms. B. Goel for the respondent Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4 and Mr. C. Baruah, learned Central Government Counsel appearing for respondent Nos. 5 and 6.

2. When the innocent villagers are deprived of their fundamental rights guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India and the fingers of accusation for such illegal acts are pointed towards the protectors of the citizen, i.e., the Army or the police personnel, it really pricks the conscience of the court. What relief, if any, can be extended to such victims while such matters are brought to the notice of the court by way of filing writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India? This is, precisely, the question to be answered by this Court in the instant case. In fact, the Apex Court as well as this Court has dealt with such question in a number of cases and by now the law, has been settled on the point. It has been held by the Apex Court that rights inherent in Articles 21 and 22(1)of the Constitution require to be jealously and scrupulously protected. Any form of torture or cruel, inhuman or degrading tr










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top