J.CHELAMESWAR, ANIMA HAZARIKA
Bijoy Daimary – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent
Anima Hazarika, J.
1. Heard Ms. P. Bhattacharya, learned Counsel, appearing for the petitioners. Also heard Ms. B. Goel for the respondent Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4 and Mr. C. Baruah, learned Central Government Counsel appearing for respondent Nos. 5 and 6.
2. When the innocent villagers are deprived of their fundamental rights guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India and the fingers of accusation for such illegal acts are pointed towards the protectors of the citizen, i.e., the Army or the police personnel, it really pricks the conscience of the court. What relief, if any, can be extended to such victims while such matters are brought to the notice of the court by way of filing writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India? This is, precisely, the question to be answered by this Court in the instant case. In fact, the Apex Court as well as this Court has dealt with such question in a number of cases and by now the law, has been settled on the point. It has been held by the Apex Court that rights inherent in Articles 21 and 22(1)of the Constitution require to be jealously and scrupulously protected. Any form of torture or cruel, inhuman or degrading tr
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.