B.D.AGARWAL
Ismail SK. – Appellant
Versus
Bani Hussain – Respondent
B.D. Agarwal, J.
1. This criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed against the order dated 5.9.2006 passed by Shri A.C. Marak, learned Magistrate First Class, West Garo Hills, Tura in Misc. Case No. 36/2006. By the impugned order, the learned Magistrate has attached the disputed land purportedly in exercise of his power conferred under Section 146(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (briefly 'Cr.P.C.'). Being aggrieved with the order of attachment, the second party in the trial court has preferred this revision application.
2. I have heard Shri A.S. Siddique, learned Counsel for the petitioners and Shri A.H. Hazarika, learned Counsel for the respondents. I have also perused the impugned order.
3. Brief facts giving rise to the filing of the criminal proceeding as well as this revision application are that the petitioners are claiming the tile and possession over the disputed land by way of inheritance, whereas the respondents are claiming tile and interest on the basis of the purchase of the disputed land from the predecessor-in-interest of the disputed land. Once earlier also, this matter had come to this Court vide Civil Rule No. 3
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.