SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Gau) 461

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI
Iqbal Ahmed Ansari, J.
Abdul Sobhan Khan
Vs.
State of Assam
Crl. Appeal No. 151 of 2005
Decided On: 29.06.2007

Advocates Appeared:
For Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff: J.M. Choudhury, Adv.
For Respondents/Defendant: K. Munir, Adv.

The burden of proof on the prosecution to establish the charge against the accused beyond all reasonable doubt.

Headnote:

IPC - Conviction under Section 489B IPC - Sections 292, 293 and 294 of the Code of Criminal Procedure - The court discussed the admissibility of the report received from the Reserve Bank of India and emphasized the necessity of examining the officer of the Reserve Bank of India to prove the contents of the report. The court highlighted the burden of proof on the prosecution to establish the charge against the accused beyond all reasonable doubt.

Fact of the Case:

The accused was convicted under Section 489B IPC for possessing fake currency notes. The prosecution's case relied on the report received from the Reserve Bank of India to prove the currency notes were fake.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the contents of the report from the Reserve Bank of India were not admissible as evidence without examining the officer who gave the opinion. It emphasized the prosecution's burden to prove the charge beyond all reasonable doubt.

Issues: Admissibility of the report from the Reserve Bank of India and the burden of proof on the prosecution.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the report from the Reserve Bank of India was not admissible without examining the officer who gave the opinion and emphasized the prosecution's burden to prove the charge beyond all reasonable doubt.

Final Decision: The appeal succeeded, the accused was held not guilty, and acquitted under the benefit of doubt.

JUDGMENT

I.A. Ansari, J.

1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order, dated 04.06.05, passed, in Sessions Case No. 23/2004, by the learned sessions Judge, Morigaon, arising out of GR Case No. 525/2000, convicting the accused-Appellant under Section 489B IPC and sentencing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period often years and pay fine of Rs. 50,000/- and, in default of payment of fine, suffer rigorous imprisonment for a further period of five years.

2. The case of the prosecution, as unfolded at the trial, may, in brief, be described as follows: Constable Radheshyam Bhar of 5th A.P. Bn. gave, on 16.10.2000, at about 10.30 a.m., to the then i/c, Neli Police Outpost, Sub-Inspector Thuleswar Bora, a currency note of rupees five hundred denomination and asked for change. As Sub-Inspector Thuleswar Bora suspected that the said currency note was a fake one, he made a query from Constable Radheshyam as to where he had got the said currency note from. Responding to the query, so made, Constable Radheshyam replied by saying that he had received the said currency note from Constable Abdul Sobhan Khan (i.e., the accused-Appellant), who also belonged to 5 the A.P. Bn. A search for Constable Abdul Sobhan Khan revealed that he had gone to Ajori for collecting his pay. In the meanwhile, Constables Deepak Boro, Rajkumar Singh and Phukan Tatas also informed Sub-Inspector Thuleswar Bora that they too had been given rupees five hundred denomination currency notes by Constable Sobhan Khan. All those notes were brought to the said outpost and were seized, vide seizure lists (Exhibit 4 and 5), by the said In-charge and a G.D. entry was made, in this regard. Exhibit 7(1) being the said G.D. entry. Having learnt that the accused was at Jagirod, the said In-charge proceeded towards Jagirod; but, in the meanwhile, he came to learn that Constable Sobhan Khan had delivered currency notes at a jewellery shop, namely, Assam Jewellery, too. This currency note was also seized by seizure list (Exhibit 8). The accused was, then, arrested at Jagirod. Upon apprehending the accused, a written Ejahar was formally lodged, on 17.10.2000, at the outpost and a case was accordingly registered against the accused under Sections 489A,489B and 489C IPC. During the course of investigation, the said seized currency notes were sent to the Reserve Bank of India for examination and opinion. A report was accordingly received from the bank, Exhibit 9 being the said report, wherein it was opined that the seized currency notes were fake ones. On completion of investigation, a charge-sheet was submitted against Constable Sobhan Khan and two others under Sections 489A, 489B and 489 of the Indian Penal Code. The accused-appellant was the lone person to face the trial as the remaining two accused had absconded.

3. During trial, the accused-Appellant pleaded not guilty to the charges framed against him. In support of their case, prosecution examined altogether 7 witnesses including the Investigating Officer. The accused-Appellant was, then, examined under Section 313 Code of Criminal Procedure. In his examination aforementioned, the accused-Appellant denied that he had committed the offences alleged to have committed by him, the case of the defence being that of total denial. No evidence was, however, adduced by the defence. On finding the accused-Appellant guilty of the offence under Section 489B IPC, learned trial Court convicted him accordingly and passed the sentence against him as mentioned hereinabove. Hence, the present appeal.

4. I have heard Mr. J.M. Choudhury, learned Senior Counsel, appearing on behalf of the accused-Appellant, and Mr. K. Munir, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam.

5. Since the prosecution's case commences with the production of the alleged currency note by Constable Radheshyam (P.W. 4) before Sub-Inspector Thuleswar Bora, i/c, Neli outpost (P.W. 7), it is appropriate that the evidence of P.W. 4 be first taken into account. Accordi







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top