SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Gau) 235

BIPLAB KUMAR SHARMA
Nihar Ranjan Bhattacharjee – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff:K.N. Choudhury, Sr. Advocate and S. Shyam
For Respondents/Defendant: P.C. Goswami

ORDER

Biplab Kumar Sharma, J.

1. The challenge in this writ petition is to the notice under Section 13(2) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. The petitioner is a retired State Government employee and he owns a plot of land at Guwahati wherein he has constructed a two-storied building. He stood guarantor for repayment of the loan obtained by the respondent No. 4 from the State Bank of India, by mortgaging the said immovable property. The financial assistance by way of loan rendered to the respondent No. 4 by the Bank was for Rs. 13,50,000/-. Apart from the loan agreement by and between the respondent No. 4 and the Bank, the petitioner also entered into a separate agreement undertaking to stand as guarantor in respect of the loan.

2. The respondent No. 4 after obtaining the loan from the Bank started his business in electric goods in the name and style of M/s. Real Deal Corporation. The respondent No. 5 is the wife of the respondent No. 4 and she has been working in the Bank. According to the petitioner, she taking advantage of her employment in the Bank managed to persuade the authorities of the bank to take over
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top